{{ t.servicesP }}
{{ s.body }}
{{ t.approachP }}
{{ p.body }}
{{ t.pricingP }}
{{ t.workP }}
{{ c.after }}
{{ t.bio1 }}
{{ t.bio2 }}
“{{ v.quote }}”
{{ w.a }}
{{ t.securityP }}
{{ x.d }}
{{ t.contactP }}
{{ t.fPrivacy }}
{{ statusMsg }}
Proposals reviewed by someone who ran and evaluated government programmes from the agency side. We know which sentences earn points and which ones a panel reads past. Selection is rarely decided by capability alone.
We recommend the programmes that show your company identity and direction at their best. We catch the small details, so a company that deserves selection is not passed over for one. Take all three stages or just the one you need.
We review your existing proposal against the panel's scoring sheet and identify exactly where points are being lost and what has to be strengthened.
An AI-drafted proposal looks complete, but it cannot explain why this project matters to this particular call. We read every sentence ourselves and rebuild the argument so your direction and the programme's policy goal line up.
We build the deck and the question list together, then run a rehearsal under the same conditions as the real panel.
The same sequence applies whether you take one service or all of them. We schedule backwards from the deadline; three to four days is typical.
Tell us the part you need. We confirm feasibility and timing straight away.
We read the call and your documents against the scoring criteria.
We separate strong criteria from weak ones and set out how to close the gaps.
Consulting runs over phone and video meetings.
Scope and fee are agreed before work begins, and nothing is added to the bill along the way. Fees depend on scope and volume, so we confirm the scope and send you a quote when you enquire.
The three situations we hear most often, with what we do in each.
We recommend the programmes that fit, based on your sector, company status and the application window.
We build the structure and a worked sample first, so you start from a document that only needs its content filled in.
We review your past proposals and the RFP, analyse how the agency is running the programme, identify why it failed and set out the route that can succeed.
I designed and ran support programmes from inside a government body. I saw where a call for proposals comes from in policy terms, what a panel is waiting to hear in the room, and which submissions get set aside first. I know the tone an agency expects, the direction it wants a project framed in, how a report should look and how KPIs should be set. I now use that view to get client proposals selected.
Every engagement is handled personally. I walk you through every angle that raises the chance of selection.
“It took two rejections to see the problem. Rewritten around the scoring criteria rather than the technology, the outcome changed.”
“We had no idea the government had a direction it wanted the project framed in. One call and it was clear how to write it.”
“We kept failing at the panel. Knowing the questions reviewers actually ask made the preparation obvious.”
We read the call for you and return a list of eligibility conditions and required documents. The first call ends with a clear next step.
If the odds are poor we say so before any work begins, and look for a programme that fits instead.
The free call covers it. We check whether the conditions and the programme direction match your company before anything else.
Applications for government programmes carry a company’s technology and commercial strategy in full. They are handled under the following principles.
Business plans and related documents provided for review are handled as trade secrets within the meaning of Article 2(2) of the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act.
Materials are used only within the scope of the engagement and are never provided or disclosed to a third party without the client’s prior consent.
Names and contact details obtained during consultation are collected and used only within the scope of that consultation under Article 15 of the Personal Information Protection Act, and are deleted without delay once the purpose is fulfilled, under Article 21 of the same Act.
A non-disclosure agreement may be executed before any materials are sent. These principles apply whether or not such an agreement is in place.
Every engagement is carried out by the principal consultant. Materials are not shared with outside staff or partner firms.
It does not have to be organised yet. Tell us which programme you are looking at and what feels unclear, and we will take a first look.
Leave either an email address or a phone number so we can reply. Files are used only for review and are never shared outside this practice.